4.4 Article

Experimental Testing of a Tensegrity Simplex: Self-Stress Implementation and Static Loading

期刊

JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
卷 149, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/JSENDH.STENG-11517

关键词

Self-stress mode; Infinitesimal mechanism; Equilibrium matrix; Dynamic relaxation; Sensitivity matrix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A physical model of a 3D tensegrity unit was built and tested both experimentally and numerically. The results showed that regardless of the geometric impacts, the internal forces followed the same linear trend. The compressive tests revealed a unique load-displacement relationship that depended on the self-stress level. This study provides a detailed overview of the structural behavior of the tensegrity unit and discusses the limitations of the analysis methods used.
A physical model of the simplest three-dimensional tensegrity unit was built at human scale out of aluminum. Self-stress implementation and static loading tests were performed on this model. At each step, accurate measurements were obtained for all nodal positions and element forces. For the prestressing phase, elongations were imposed, via mechanical devices, in different combinations of elements, called prestress scenarios. Experimental results are compared to the theoretical self-stress state obtained by singular value decomposition of the equilibrium matrix and to numerical simulations using the dynamic relaxation method. It is shown that internal forces follow the same linear trend for all prestress scenarios even if the geometry is significantly impacted. Compressive tests were conducted by hanging masses from the top nodes. It is shown that there exists a unique load-displacement relation that follows the infinitesimal mechanism direction for a finite distance, which depends on the self-stress level. The paper provides a detailed overview of the simplex's structural behavior using both experimental and numerical results while discussing the limitations of the analysis methods explored.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据