4.0 Article

Exploratory examination of the scale structure of the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale: Application of Rasch Measurement Theory

期刊

JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2256516

关键词

Spinal cord injuries; Self-efficacy; Questionnaire design; Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Rasch analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the application of the Rasch Measurement Model to the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (MSES), finding issues with the original scale's structural and content validity. Adjustments were made to the rating scale and two items were removed based on the analysis. However, due to the small sample size, the results may be biased and further research is needed for validation.
Objective: Exploratory application of the Rasch Measurement (RM) Model for evidence for reproducibility, conceptual/content validity, and structural validity of the Moorong Self-Efficacy Scale (MSES).Study Design: Secondary RM analysis of data collected in a randomized controlled trial comparing two exercise interventions for persons living with spinal cord injury (SCI).Setting: Community-dwelling persons living with SCI enrolled in an exercise study.Participants: Adults (n = 79) enrolled in the parent study had a traumatic SCI > 3 months prior, injury level C5 to T12.Interventions: Not applicable.Outcome measure: The original MSES is a 16-item measure of self-efficacy with a 7-level response scale for un/certainty which was developed for use with persons living with SCI.Results: We addressed item misfit, infrequent category endorsement, and category step disorder by removing two items and reorganizing the rating scale. Rating scale changes removed category 4 (Neutral), combined categories 1-3 (Very Uncertain, Somewhat Uncertain, and Uncertain) for all items, and further combined certainty categories for two items. Principal components analysis of the residuals indicated a possible second dimension with a first-contrast Eigenvalue of 2.4. However, the contrasted item groups had explained variance <10% and a dis-attenuated correlation = 0.92 indicating they measure the same underlying trait. The small sample size precluded examination of differential item functioning.Conclusions: Exploratory RM analysis of MSES produced a 14-item Rasch version which identified structural and content validity evidence concerns inherent in the original MSES. However, results could be biased by a small sample size and further study should examine the item content and rating scale structure with larger, more diverse samples of persons living with SCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据