4.3 Article

Electrochemical regeneration of glyphosate-saturated carbon as an alternative for activated carbon reutilization

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-023-05633-4

关键词

Glyphosate removal; Adsorption; Activated carbon; Electrochemical regeneration; Boron-doped diamond

向作者/读者索取更多资源

One challenge in removing emerging contaminants is the low concentrations in the environment, which reduces efficiency. To overcome this, a pre-concentration step and contaminant degradation can be applied. This study demonstrates the use of activated carbon adsorption and anodic oxidation for the treatment of GLY-contaminated wastewater.
One of the challenges in removing contaminants of emerging concern is the reduced efficiency due to their low concentrations in the natural environment. To overcome this, a pre-concentration step can be applied, followed by the degradation of the contaminant. In this sense, adsorption on activated carbon (AC) can be used in the first step, while anodic oxidation is suitable for eliminating the pollutant and regenerating the carbon. This work applies, for the first time, this principle to treating synthetic wastewater contaminated with glyphosate (GLY). First, the adsorption of GLY onto the AC is studied at different pHs, observing a more intense adsorption in acid pH, whereas the adsorption weakens in neutral and alkaline pH. Furthermore, the addition of NaCl reduces the GLY adsorption on AC. The subsequent electrochemical regeneration (ER) is applied to the saturated AC under different currents for five consecutive cycles in a batch reactor equipped with a boron-doped diamond anode. The results demonstrate that the ER is effective in recovering carbon adsorption capacity with levels above 80% compared to the initial capacity after the five consecutive cycles if a current of 0.3 A is applied. Thus, this work intends to demonstrate that the ER can play a critical role in the AC circular economy, making its reutilization possible when applied, as in this case, to the GLY removal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据