4.4 Article

A role of the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)-S1P receptor 2 pathway in epithelial defense against cancer (EDAC)

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 491-499

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E15-03-0161

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [26114001, 26250026, (DC1) 26.2366]
  2. AMED Strategic Japanese-Swiss Cooperative Program
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26114001, 15K21757, 14J02366, 15H05589, 26293041, 26115701, 26114008, 26860254, 15H01248, 15K15023, 15KK0290, 26250026] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

At the initial step of carcinogenesis, transformation occurs in single cells within epithelia, where the newly emerging transformed cells are surrounded by normal epithelial cells. A recent study revealed that normal epithelial cells have an ability to sense and actively eliminate the neighboring transformed cells, a process named epithelial defense against cancer (EDAC). However, the molecular mechanism of this tumor-suppressive activity is largely unknown. In this study, we investigated a role for the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P)-S1P receptor 2 (S1PR2) pathway in EDAC. First, we show that addition of the S1PR2 inhibitor significantly suppresses apical extrusion of RasV12-transformed cells that are surrounded by normal cells. In addition, knockdown of S1PR2 in normal cells induces the same effect, indicating that S1PR2 in the surrounding normal cells plays a positive role in the apical elimination of the transformed cells. Of importance, not endogenous S1P but exogenous S1P is involved in this process. By using FRET analyses, we demonstrate that S1PR2 mediates Rho activation in normal cells neighboring RasV12-transformed cells, thereby promoting accumulation of filamin, a crucial regulator of EDAC. Collectively these data indicate that S1P is a key extrinsic factor that affects the outcome of cell competition between normal and transformed epithelial cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据