4.4 Article

Augmin shapes the anaphase spindle for efficient cytokinetic furrow ingression and abscission

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE CELL
卷 27, 期 5, 页码 812-827

出版社

AMER SOC CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.E15-02-0101

关键词

-

资金

  1. Akiyama Life Science Foundation
  2. Mochida Memorial Foundation
  3. Naito Foundation
  4. Nakajima Foundation
  5. Northern Advancement Center for Science and Technology
  6. SGH Foundation
  7. Sumitomo Foundation
  8. Takeda Science Foundation
  9. Uehara Memorial Foundation
  10. Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology
  11. Seventh Framework Programme FP7 [241548, 258068]
  12. ERC [281198]
  13. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26711012, 15K14501] Funding Source: KAKEN
  14. European Research Council (ERC) [281198] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

During anaphase, distinct populations of microtubules (MTs) form by either centrosome-dependent or augmin-dependent nucleation. It remains largely unknown whether these different MT populations contribute distinct functions to cytokinesis. Here we show that augmin-dependent MTs are required for the progression of both furrow ingression and abscission. Augmin depletion reduced the accumulation of anillin, a contractile ring regulator at the cell equator, yet centrosomal MTs were sufficient to mediate RhoA activation at the furrow. This defect in contractile ring organization, combined with incomplete spindle pole separation during anaphase, led to impaired furrow ingression. During the late stages of cytokinesis, astral MTs formed bundles in the intercellular bridge, but these failed to assemble a focused midbody structure and did not establish tight linkage to the plasma membrane, resulting in furrow regression. Thus augmin-dependent acentrosomal MTs and centrosomal MTs contribute to nonredundant targeting mechanisms of different cytokinesis factors, which are required for the formation of a functional contractile ring and midbody.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据