4.6 Article

The diagnostic accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale without the self-harm item

期刊

JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
卷 165, 期 -, 页码 70-76

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.07.015

关键词

Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale; Suicidal ideation; Self-harm; Pregnancy; Postpartum; Screening; Sensitivity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is widely used for screening perinatal depression, but its 10th item for evaluating suicide ideation is inaccurate and may cause distress. The study suggests that the EPDS-9 without the 10th item is highly correlated with the full EPDS or EPDS-10. The EPDS-9 performs equivalently to EPDS-10 in differentiating depression diagnosis and screening for depression.
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the most commonly used screening tool for perinatal depression. However, the 10th item of the EPDS intended to evaluate suicide ideation does not accurately capture suicide ideation and may cause psychological distress. Whereas endorsement of the strongest agreement yes, quite often on this item may be associated with suicide ideation, the response on this frequency is perfectly predicted by the EPDS full score. The discard of this item, therefore, is preferred. In the current study, using data from a nation-wide internet survey conducted in Japanese postpartum (n = 5688) and pregnant women (n = 1639), we show that the EPDS-9 without the 10th item correlates perfectly with the full EPDS or EPDS-10. Furthermore, the EPDS-9 and EPDS-10 have equivalent performance in differentiating participants' selfreported depression diagnosis as well as Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K6)-based screening of depression. Lastly, at the cutoff of 9, the EPDS-9 performs well in predicting participants' response on the 10th item of EPDS; specifically, the sensitivity of differentiating frequent thoughts of self-harm is 0.968 and 1 in postpartum and pregnant women, respectively. Therefore, the EPDS-9 performs equivalently to EPDS-10 and can be considered to replace EPDS-10 in future use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据