4.3 Article

Effect of moral sensitivity on professional values of undergraduate nursing students: Mediating effect of empathic tendency

期刊

JOURNAL OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 44-51

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.08.013

关键词

Empathy; Nursing students; Undergraduate nursing course; Professional values; Moral sensitivity; Mediation analysis; Ethics

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to examine the mediating effect of empathy between moral sensitivity and professional values. The results showed that moral sensitivity not only directly affected nursing students' professional values, but also indirectly through empathic tendency. This suggests that nurse educators can enhance nursing students' professional values by integrating moral sensitivity and empathic tendency in their curriculum.
Background: The development of professional values in nursing students is an important issue for the nursing profession. However, the research on nursing students' professional values and its related factors is very limited. Purpose: This cross-sectional and correlational study aimed to examine the mediating effect of empathy between moral sensitivity and professional values. Methods: This study was conducted with 328 second, third and fourth-year students. The participants completed an online survey consisting of the student information form, Modified Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire for Student Nurses, Empathic Tendency Scale and Nursing Professional Values Scale. Results: The results showed that moral sensitivity affected undergraduate nursing students' professional values not only directly but also indirectly through empathic tendency. Conclusions: The results of the study show that moral sensitivity and empathic tendency support the acquisition of professional values in undergraduate nursing students. Nurse educators needs to realize that can be improved professional values by integrating moral sensitivity and empathic tendency in their curriculum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据