4.8 Article

Impact of the manufacturing process on graphite blend electrodes with silicon nanoparticles for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 580, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233367

关键词

Li-ion batteries; Silicon nanoparticles; Graphite; Slurry; Negative electrodes; Calendering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to understand the relationship between different steps of the Lithium-Ion Battery (LiB) electrode-making process by correlating the input/output parameters. Fostering the interrelation of properties in silicon/graphite blend negative electrodes benefits the comprehension, quantification, and prediction of LiB output properties. The impact of manufacturing parameters during mixing, coating, and calendering on the properties of silicon/graphite blend negative electrodes is reported.
Correlating the input/output parameters of the manufacturing process aims to understand the link between the different steps of the Lithium-Ion Battery (LiB) electrode-making process. Fostering the interrelation of the properties in silicon/graphite blends for fabricating negative electrodes benefits the comprehension, quantification, and prediction of LiB output properties. Here, we report the impact of the manufacturing parameters during mixing, coating, and calendering on the properties of silicon/graphite blend negative electrodes. The mixing process was evaluated depending on the graphite content, where the viscosity increases with its percentage. Moreover, the slurry rheology directly impacts the electrode stability when the coating is done by using broader comma gaps. The calendering step evidences a porosity threshold necessary for adequate ionic resistance, tortuosity factor, and cycling life. Strong calendering increased the current collector adhesion, ionic resistance, tortuosity factor, and high cycling instability. On the other hand, better cyclabilities are obtained at moderate calendered electrodes, exhibiting the lowest ionic resistances and tortuosity factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据