4.8 Review

Recent progress, challenges, and perspectives in the development of solid-state electrolytes for sodium batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES
卷 581, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233518

关键词

Solid-state electrolytes; Sodium-ion batteries; Ionic conductivity; Chemical stability; Electrochemical stability windows

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the sustainable energy storage technologies of solid-state sodium batteries and the challenges they face. It proposes strategies to improve the performance of solid-state sodium batteries by studying different types of solid electrolytes. The prospects of solid electrolyte development in the future are also analyzed.
Sustainable energy storage technologies, such as all-solid-state sodium batteries, are seen as a promising field of research. The high energy and power densities of all-solid-state sodium batteries, together with their low cost and abundant reserves of Na metal, give them a good reputation. When it comes to creating safe, high-energy-density sodium-ion batteries, solid state electrolytes are crucial. The fundamental issue with developing all-solid-state sodium batteries is their comparatively low performance because of low ionic conductivity of sodium ions, interfacial resistance with electrodes, and thermal and electrochemical stability. In this article, recent development to overcome challenges associated with different solid state electrolytes i.e., inorganic solid electrolytes that include the beta-alumina, NASICON, sulfide base electrolyte, as well as the solid-polymer and hybrid solid electrolytes, have been discussed. Key requirements for the development of future solid state electrolytes are highlighted and different strategies to improve the performance of solid state electrolytes have been proposed. The prospects for enhancing the properties of all-solid-state sodium batteries in real-world applications as well as the future development of solid electrolytes are also analyzed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据