4.6 Article

Silicon Application Alleviates Arsenic Toxicity in Isatis (Isatis cappadocica Desv.) by Modulating Key Biochemical Attributes and Antioxidant Defense Systems

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00344-023-11079-9

关键词

Arsenate; Arsenite; Isatis; Antioxidants; Tolerance; Silicic acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Silicon (Si) nutrition can improve plant tolerance to abiotic stresses caused by arsenic (As) toxicity. Exogenous application of Si effectively mitigates As stress by decreasing As accumulation and activating the antioxidant defense system.
Arsenic (As) toxicity hinders plant growth and productivity and poses human health concerns. However, silicon (Si) nutrition can help improve plant tolerance to abiotic stresses. This study evaluated the influence of Si application on plant growth and As accumulation in an As hyperaccumulator plant, Isatis (Isatis cappadocica Desv.) under As stress. Isatis seedlings were exposed to 0, 5, 25, 125, and 625 & mu;M Na(2)HAsO(4.)7H(2)O (AsV) and NaAsO2 (AsIII) and then Si was applied as Na2SiO3 (1 and 2 mM). Plant exposure to As(V: 650 & mu;M) and As(III: 125 & mu;M) caused significant reduction in plant fresh weight by 31 and 42%, and photosynthetic pigments by 47 and 62%, respectively. The same treatments caused 37- and 4.2-fold increase in levels of reactive oxygen species. However, exogenous application of Si effectively mitigated As stress, and caused a decrease in shoot As concentration up to 15% and 21% in As(V) and As(III) treated plants, respectively. In this regard, Si application at 1 mM level was more effective. The Si-induced tolerance against As in Isatis was attributed to the activation of antioxidant defense system (increase in the activities of gluthatione-S-transferase and guaiacol peroxidase, carotenoids, proline and anthocyanin contents). In conclusion, Si application improved the As tolerance in Isatis plants by modulating plant growth, decreasing As accumulation and activating the antioxidant defense system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据