4.6 Article

Tunable strong plasmon-exciton coupling based modulator employing borophene and deep subwavelength perovskite grating

期刊

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6463/ace8a4

关键词

strong plasmon-exciton coupling; perovskite exciton; borophene plasmon

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a diffraction-unlimited system composed of a borophene layer and perovskite grating is proposed to investigate the strong coupling between the borophene guiding plasmon (BGP) and perovskite exciton (PE) modes. The resonant energy of the BGP mode can be tuned to match the energy of the PE mode, resulting in a remarkable Rabi splitting. The proposed electrically tunable hybrid system enables high reflective amplitude modulation depth and phase range modulation.
Two-dimensional materials support deeply confined and tunable plasmonic modes, which have great potential for achieving device miniaturization and flexible manipulation. In this paper, we propose a diffraction-unlimited system (period & AP; & lambda;/20) composed of borophene layer and perovskite grating to investigate the strong coupling between the borophene guiding plasmon (BGP) and perovskite exciton (PE) modes. The resonant energy of the BGP mode could be electrically tuned to match the energy of the PE mode, and a remarkable Rabi splitting is attained under zero-detuning conditions. The splitting energy could reach 230 meV due to the strong field enhancement provided by the BGP mode. Taking advantage of the proposed electrically tunable hybrid system, not only is the reflective amplitude modulation depth up to 99.9%, but the 1.76 & pi; phase range modulation is achieved. Furthermore, by increasing the distance between the borophene layer and perovskite grating, a passive parity-time symmetry breaking could be observed with the vanished energy splitting. Our results deepen our understanding of light-matter interactions at the sub-wavelength scale and provide a guideline for designing active plasmonic devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据