4.8 Article

Single-Shot Nondestructive Quantum Sensing for Gaseous Samples with Hundreds of Chiral Molecules

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
卷 14, 期 30, 页码 6772-6777

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01622

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a single-shot nondestructive quantum sensing method for efficient detection of tiny amounts of chiral substances, especially at the single-molecule level. Our scheme involves two steps: first, the two enantiomers are prepared in different rotational states via microwave enantio-specific state transfer. Then, chiral discrimination is transferred to quantum hypothesis testing. By introducing a nondestructive quantum-state detection technique assisted with a microwave resonator, the molecular chirality is determined by the sign of the output signals.
Chiral discrimination that is efficient at detecting tiny amounts of chiral substances, especially at the single-molecule level, is in great demand. Here, we propose a single-shot nondestructive quantum sensing method addressing such an issue. Our scheme consists of two steps. In the first step, the two enantiomers are prepared in different rotational states via microwave enantio-specific state transfer. Then, chiral discrimination is transferred to quantum hypothesis testing. In the second step, we for the first time introduce a nondestructive quantum-state detection technique assisted with a microwave resonator for chiral discrimination, through which the molecular chirality is determined by the sign of the output signals. Using a typical chiral molecule, 1,2-propanediol, and an experimentally feasible model based on spherical Fabry-Perot cavity, we show that the molecular chirality of slowly moving enantiopure gaseous samples with 10(2)-10(3) molecules can be highly credibly distinguished in a single-shot detection. By further trapping chiral molecules, it is promising to achieve chiral discrimination at the single-molecule level by using our approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据