4.6 Article

Tubene: An Exotic Two-Dimensional Carbon Allotrope with Abundant Topological Quantum States

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 127, 期 43, 页码 21423-21430

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c05433

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a new two-dimensional carbon allotrope Tubene assembled by carbon nanotubes and demonstrates its topological properties and multiple quantum states through electronic property analysis. These findings not only enrich the family of carbon allotropes but also provide an assembly strategy for designing new two-dimensional topological materials with desired quantum states.
Searching for various topological quantum states near the Fermi level is a hot topic in the field of condensed matter physics. On the basis of first-principles calculations, we predict a new two-dimensional (2D) carbon allotrope assembled by (6,0) carbon nanotubes, termed Tubene. Our results show that Tubene has superb dynamical and thermal stability; in energy, it is even more stable than several synthesized 2D carbon allotropes. The analysis of the electronic properties reveals that it is an intrinsic topological semimetal with two open nodal lines across the whole first Brillouin zone, which are protected by the M z mirror symmetry. Remarkably, multiple quantum states can be induced by modest strains, including nodal line states and different isolated nodal point states (e.g., quadratic Weyl state, linear type-II Weyl state, and linear triple degenerate state). In the low-energy band of these nodal points, strong dispersion anisotropy is detected; in particular, along a special k-direction, a kind of intriguing critical dispersion is identified for the first time, which consists of a quadratic conductive band and a valence flat band. These findings not only enrich the family of carbon allotropes but also highlight a nanotube-based assembly strategy for designing new 2D topological materials with various desirable quantum states.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据