4.6 Article

Nanostructure-Based Plasmon-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopic Strategies for Characterization of the Solid-Electrolyte Interphase: Opportunities and Challenges

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 127, 期 28, 页码 13466-13477

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02954

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The physicochemical properties of the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) at anodes of lithium-based batteries are crucial. Nanostructure-based plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (PERS) techniques have offered significant opportunities for nondestructive and real-time studies of SEI. This Perspective highlights the recent progress in PERS and discusses its advantages and limitations for characterizing SEI and related interfacial processes.
The physicochemical properties of the solid-electrolyteinterphase (SEI) at anodes of lithium-based batteries are crucial for achieving the highest performance, and therefore, accurate characterizationsare necessary to reveal the molecular structure and chemical propertiesof SEI. Nanostructure-based plasmon-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (PERS)techniques rely on localized surface plasmonic enhancement mechanismand have offered significant opportunities, albeit with challenges,for nondestructive and real-time studies of SEI over the past twodecades. In this Perspective, we highlight the recent progress inPERS, including surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS), tip-enhancedRaman spectroscopy (TERS), and shell-isolated nanoparticle-enhancedRaman spectroscopy (SHINERS) as a class of highly sensitive chemicalfingerprint techniques for investigating the structure and chemistryof SEI. We also discuss the advantages and limitations of PERS forcharacterizing SEI and related interfacial processes. Lastly, we providepossible directions on how PERS can be further effectively leveragedto advance the characterization of interfaces and interphases of Li-basedbatteries, which could also be challenges for physical chemistryand energy chemistry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据