4.6 Article

Quantifying Aqueous Radiolytic Products in Liquid Phase Electron Microscopy

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 127, 期 31, 页码 15512-15522

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c02359

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Liquid phase electron microscopy (LPEM) is important for studying chemical processes in situ, but the interaction between the liquid medium and the electron beam leads to radiolysis and the formation of reactive species that affect the studied processes. Current understanding of LPEM radiolysis is based on simulations using data collected at low electron flux intensities, requiring extrapolation to match the intensities used in LPEM. This study demonstrates a new approach to validate simulations by directly measuring radiolytic products during in situ LPEM.
Liquid phase electron microscopy (LPEM) is rapidly gainingimportancefor in situ studies of chemical processes. However, radiolysis dueto interactions between the liquid medium and the electron beam resultsin the formation of highly reactive species that influence the studiedprocesses. Our understanding of LPEM radiolysis is currently basedon simulations that rely on data collected from measurements at lowelectron flux intensities, requiring extrapolation by several ordersof magnitude to match the intensities utilized in LPEM. We demonstratedirect electrochemical measurements of radiolytic products duringin situ LPEM, which allows us to directly assess the high flux accuracyof low-flux radiolysis models. Using a specially designed liquid cellfor electrochemical detection, we quantify the primary expected stableradiolysis products H-2 and H2O2 ina scanning electron microscope. We find H-2 production israpid and in reasonable agreement with predictions, but H2O2 levels are lower than expected from the low-flux extrapolatedradiolysis models. This study demonstrates a new approach to experimentallyvalidate simulations and indicates that the chemical environment maybe far more reducing than predicted from current models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据