4.6 Article

Unveiling the Potential of Ag2S Reference Electrode: Empowering Calcium Electrochemical Reactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C
卷 127, 期 40, 页码 19900-19905

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.3c04580

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With the increasing interest in postlithium technologies like calcium batteries, the scarcity of suitable reference electrodes poses a significant challenge. This study introduces a silver-(I) sulfide reference electrode for calcium-ion battery research, showing promise based on comprehensive structural characterization and electrochemical analysis. The standard reduction potential of Ag2S relative to the standard hydrogen electrode and the voltage drift over time have been determined. Ag2S is a potential reference electrode material for future calcium-ion battery research.
With the escalating global energy demands, the quest for postlithium technologies, such as calcium batteries, has gained significant momentum. Nevertheless, a formidable hurdle in calcium research resides in the scarcity of suitable reference electrodes. This study introduces a silver-(I) sulfide (Ag2S) reference electrode for use in calcium-ion battery research based on a silver wire coated with silver-(I) sulfide crystals. Comprehensive structural characterization through Raman spectroscopy, coupled with a 48 h cyclic voltammetry electrochemical analysis, has been conducted. By utilizing three nonaqueous calcium-ion electrolytes, the standard reduction potential of Ag2S relative to the standard hydrogen electrode has been determined, along with the quantification of voltage drift over time. The Ag2S standard reduction potentials varied from -0.291 to -0.477 V vs SHE, and the drift followed a linear behavior with slopes between -0.28 and -2.45 mV/h. A side reaction between ferrocene and silver ions is also observed with voltages scanned above 0.65 V. Ag2S shows promise as a reference electrode material for future calcium-ion battery research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据