4.5 Article

Timing of Phagosome Maturation Depends on Their Transport Switching from Actin to Microtubule Tracks

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 127, 期 43, 页码 9312-9322

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c05647

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used particle sensors to investigate the maturation process of phagosomes, and found that the transition from actin to microtubule transport mode can regulate the duration and maturation speed of early phagosomes. This is crucial for effective degradation of pathogens.
Phagosomes, specialized membrane compartments responsible for digesting internalized pathogens, undergo sequential dynamic and biochemical changes as they mature from nascent phagosomes to degradative phagolysosomes. Maturation of phagosomes depends on their transport along actin filaments and microtubules. However, the specific quantitative relationship between the biochemical transformation and transport dynamics remains poorly characterized. The autonomous nature of phagosomes, moving and maturing at different rates, makes understanding this relationship challenging. Addressing this challenge, in this study we engineered particle sensors to image and quantify single phagosomes' maturation. We found that as phagosomes move from the actin cortex to microtubule tracks, the timing of their actin-to-microtubule transition governs the duration of the early phagosome stage before acquiring degradative capacities. Prolonged entrapment of phagosomes in the actin cortex extends the early phagosome stage by delaying the dissociation of early endosome markers and phagosome acidification. Conversely, a shortened transition from actin- to microtubule-based movements causes the opposite effect on phagosome maturation. These results suggest that the actin- and microtubule-based transport of phagosomes functions like a clock to coordinate the timing of biochemical events during phagosome maturation, which is crucial for effective pathogen degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据