4.5 Article

Statistical Inference of Rate Constants in Chemical and Biochemical Reaction Networks Using an Inverse Event-Driven Kinetic Monte Carlo Method

期刊

JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY B
卷 127, 期 42, 页码 9132-9143

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.3c03649

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a novel algorithm that infers kinetic parameters from the system's time evolution to reconstruct distributions of stochastic processes. The proposed approach accurately replicates rate constants of evolving stochastic reaction networks over time and can be successfully used to estimate rate constants of association and dissociation events in molecular dynamics simulations.
The use of rate models for networks of stochastic reactions is frequently used to comprehend the macroscopically observed dynamic properties of finite size reactive systems as well as their relationship to the underlying molecular events. tau his particular approach usually stumbles on parameter derivation associated with stochastic kinetics, a quite demanding procedure. The present study incorporates a novel algorithm, which infers kinetic parameters from the system's time evolution, manifested as changes in molecular species populations. The proposed methodology reconstructs distributions required to infer kinetic parameters of a stochastic process pertaining to either a simulation or experimental data. The suggested approach accurately replicates rate constants of the stochastic reaction networks, which have evolved over time by event-driven Monte Carlo (MC) simulations using the Gillespie algorithm. Furthermore, our approach has been successfully used to estimate rate constants of association and dissociation events between molecular species developing during molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. We certainly believe that our method will be remarkably helpful for considering the macroscopic characteristic molecular roots related to stochastic physical and biological processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据