4.6 Article

On-line extraction and determination of coumarins compounds from mouse plasma based on a homemade phenyl-hybrid monolithic adsorbent

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115851

关键词

Coumarin; Mouse plasma; Solid -phase extraction; Hybrid monolithic adsorbent; Bio-sample pretreatment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A phenyl-hybrid monolithic adsorbent with porous structure and multiple functional groups was prepared. It was used for the online extraction and quantification of coumarins in mouse plasma, showing good removal ability and selectivity.
A phenyl-hybrid monolithic adsorbent was prepared using an organic monomer of ethylene glycol phenyl ether acrylate and inorganic monomers of tetramethoxysilane and vinyltrimethoxysilane, via polycondensation and polymerization in a stainless-steel column, which shows porous structure and multiple functional groups, according to the measurements of scanning electron microscopy, nitrogen adsorption-desorption method and infrared spectroscopy. The resulting hybrid phenyl-based monolith was used as a solid-phase extraction column, combining with an analytical column in conjunction with high-performance liquid chromatography system for the on-line extraction and determination of coumarins (praeruptorin A and praeruptorin B) in Peucedani Radix from mouse plasma. The homemade hybrid monolithic solid-phase extraction column exhibits good removal ability for the sample matrices, as well as unique selectivity for the two praeruptorins. Methodology validation results indicate that the present method is applicable for the on-line extraction and quantitative analysis of praeruptorin A and praeruptorin B in Peucedani Radix from mouse plasma with a limit of quantitation 0.06 mu g/ mL and a linear range 0.06-5 mu g/mL (r>0.999), thus indicating the present method is a promising and alternative method for the quantitative determination of similar target components with micro or trace concentration from complex extract solution and plasma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据