4.6 Article

New stochastic devices for simultaneous analysis of mismatch repair proteins and KRAS in biological samples

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2023.115630

关键词

Mismatch repair proteins; Stochastic microsensors; Graphene; Cancer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two stochastic microsensors based on inulins immobilization were designed for the recognition and analysis of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and KRAS proteins. The sensors showed different working concentration ranges and limits of determination in different biological samples.
Two stochastic microsensors based on the immobilization of inulins: inutec and frutafit in a paste obtained from a graphene decorated with nitrogen (10.8 %), and boron (2.6 %), and paraffin oil (IR purity) were designed, characterized and validated for the molecular recognition and analysis of mismatch repair proteins like MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and of KRAS in biological samples such as: whole blood, urine, saliva, and tumoral tissues. The sensor based on inutec exhibited the largest working concentration range (10 decades of concentration) and the lowest limit of determination (0.32fg mL-1) when used for the assay of MLH1, and the wider working concentration range (8 decades of concentration), and the lowest limit of determination (2.30fg mL-1) when used for the assay of MSH6. The sensor based on frutafit exhibited the largest working concentration range (10 decades of concentration) when used for the determination of KRAS, and the wider working concentration range (5 decades of concentration), and the lowest limit of determination (1.00fg mL-1) when used for the assay of PMS2. No influence of the modifier (inutec and frutafit) was recorded on the linear concentration range (10 decades of concentration), and on the limit of determination (1.00 fg mL-1) for the assay of MSH2. The recoveries of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, and of KRAS in whole blood, urine, saliva, and tumoral tissues were higher than 98.00 with RSD (%) values lower than 0.10 %.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据