4.5 Article

MIST1 and PTF1 Collaborate in Feed-Forward Regulatory Loops That Maintain the Pancreatic Acinar Phenotype in Adult Mice

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 23, 页码 2945-2955

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00370-16

关键词

-

资金

  1. HHS \ NIH \ National Cancer Institute (NCI) [R01 CA124586]
  2. HHS \ NIH \ National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [R01 DK61220, R01 DK55489]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Much remains unknown regarding the regulatory networks formed by transcription factors in mature, differentiated mammalian cells in vivo, despite many studies of individual DNA-binding transcription factors. We report a constellation of feed-forward loops formed by the pancreatic transcription factors MIST1 and PTF1 that govern the differentiated phenotype of the adult pancreatic acinar cell. PTF1 is an atypical basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor complex of pancreatic acinar cells and is critical to acinar cell fate specification and differentiation. MIST1, also a basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor, enhances the formation and maintenance of the specialized phenotype of professional secretory cells. The MIST1 and PTF1 collaboration controls a wide range of specialized cellular processes, including secretory protein synthesis and processing, exocytosis, and homeostasis of the endoplasmic reticulum. PTF1 drives Mist1 transcription, and MIST1 and PTF1 bind and drive the transcription of over 100 downstream acinar genes. PTF1 binds two canonical bipartite sites within a 0.7-kb transcriptional enhancer upstream of Mist1 that are essential for the activity of the enhancer in vivo. MIST1 and PTF1 coregulate target genes synergistically or additively, depending on the target transcriptional enhancer. The frequent close binding proximity of PTF1 and MIST1 in pancreatic acinar cell chromatin implies extensive collaboration although the collaboration is not dependent on a stable physical interaction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据