4.5 Article

Absolute Amounts and Status of the Nrf2-Keap1-Cul3 Complex within Cells

期刊

MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY
卷 36, 期 24, 页码 3100-3112

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.00389-16

关键词

-

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) [24249015, 26111002, 25112502, 26111010]
  2. Takeda Science Foundation
  3. Naito Foundation
  4. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED) (CREST (chronic inflammation))
  5. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26111010, 15H02815, 26111002, 25112502] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The transcription factor Nrf2 (NF-E2-related-factor 2) is essential for the oxidative and electrophilic stress responses. Keap1 (Kelch-like-ECH-associated-protein 1), an adaptor for a cullin-3 (Cul3)-based ubiquitin ligase, regulates Nrf2 activity through proteasomal degradation, and acts as a sensor for oxidative and electrophilic stresses. The Keap1-Cul3 complex is a critical regulator of the cellular Nrf2 level, and yet quantitative information regarding their endogenous intracellular concentrations in homeostatic conditions and during stress responses is unknown. We analyzed the absolute amounts of the Nrf2, Keap1, and Cul3 proteins in five murine cell lines by comparison with serial dilutions of purified recombinant protein standards in combination with quantitative immunoblot analyses. In the basal state, the amount of Nrf2 was maintained at lower levels than those of Keap1 and Cul3 proteins, whereas the electrophilic agent diethylmaleate dramatically increased Nrf2 to a level greater than that of Keap1 and Cul3, resulting in the accumulation of Nrf2 in the nucleus. In contrast, Keap1 and Cul3 did not display any changes in their abundance, subcellular localization, or interaction in response to electrophilic stimuli. Our results demonstrate that the regulation of the Nrf2 protein level during stress responses is mediated by the activity but not the composition of the Nrf2-Keap1-Cul3 complex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据