4.6 Article

Effect of long-term Tai Chi training on Parkinson's disease: a 3.5-year follow-up cohort study

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-330967

关键词

Parkinson's disease; movement disorders; neuroepidemiology; rehabilitation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long-term Tai Chi training in patients with Parkinson's disease showed maintenance of improvement in motor and non-motor symptoms, reducing the need for increasing antiparkinsonian therapies. The annual increase in levodopa equivalent daily dosage was significantly lower in the Tai Chi group, indicating the benefits of Tai Chi training on PD symptoms and complications.
Background Tai Chi has shown beneficial effects on the motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD), but no study has reported the effect of long-term Tai Chi training.Objective To examine whether long-term Tai Chi training can maintain improvement in patients with PD.Methods Cohorts of patients with PD with Tai Chi training (n=143) and patients with PD without exercise as a control group (n=187) were built from January 2016. All subjects were assessed at baseline and in November 2019, October 2020 and June 2021. A logarithmic linear model was used to analyse rating scales for motor and non-motor symptoms. The need to increase antiparkinsonian therapies was presented as a Kaplan-Meier plot and as a box plot. The bootstrap method was used to resample for statistical estimation.Results Tai Chi training reduced the annual changes in the deterioration of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and delayed the need for increasing antiparkinsonian therapies. The annual increase in the levodopa equivalent daily dosage was significantly lower in the Tai Chi group. Moreover, patients benefited from Tai Chi training in motor symptoms, non-motor symptoms and complications.Conclusion Tai Chi training has a long-term beneficial effect on PD, with an improvement in motor and non-motor symptoms and reduced complications.Trial registration number NCT05447975.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据