4.7 Article

Cyclotheonellazoles D-I, Potent Elastase Inhibitory Thiazole-Containing Cyclic Peptides from Theonella sp. (2131)

期刊

JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.3c00633

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Six new thiazole-containing cyclic peptides were isolated and their structures were determined. These peptides exhibited potent inhibitory activities against certain enzymes. Additionally, the biological activities of two reisolated compounds were further explored.
Six new thiazole-containing cyclic peptides, the cyclotheonellazoles D-I (1-6), were isolated from the Australian marine sponge Theonella sp. (2131) with their structures assigned by comprehensive 1D and 2D NMR spectroscopic and MS spectrometric analyses, Marfey's derivatization studies, and comparison with time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculated ECD data. The Type 2 azole-homologated peptides herein comprise up to five nonproteinogenic amino acids, including the protease transition state mimic alpha-keto-beta-amino acid residue 3-amino-4-methyl- 2-oxohexanoic acid (Amoha), while 1-3 also contain a terminal hydantoin residue not previously found in cyclotheonellazoles. The keramamides A (7) and L (8) were reisolated affording expanded exploration of their biological activities. The peptides were examined for protease inhibitory activities against two mammalian serine proteases (elastase and chymotrypsin) and SARS-CoV-2 3-chymotrypsin-like protease (3CL(pro)), a validated antiviral therapeutic target for COVID-19. Peptides 1-6 and keramamide A (7) displayed potent nanomolar inhibition of elastase (IC50 16.0 to 61.8 nM), while 7 also contained modest inhibition of chymotrypsin and SARS-CoV-2 3CL(pro) (IC50 0.73 and 1.1 mu M, respectively). The cyclotheonellazoles D-E (1-3) do not affect the viability of human breast, ovarian, and colon cancer cells (>100 mu M), with the cytotoxicity previously reported for keramamide L (8) not replicated (inactive >20 mu M).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据