4.6 Article

Unraveling non-covalent interactions in bis-chalcone: A crystallographic and theoretical studies

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
卷 1297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136952

关键词

Chalcone; X-ray crystallography; Hirshfeld surface; NCI plot index; QTAIM

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structure and intermolecular interactions of a newly synthesized bis-chalcone THXA were studied using experimental and computational methods. The importance of non-covalent interactions such as pi center dot center dot center dot pi, C-H center dot center dot center dot S, and C-H center dot center dot center dot pi was revealed.
A new bis-chalcone THXA, (2E,2 ' E)-1,1 '-(((1,4-phenylenebis(methylene))bis(oxy))bis(2,1-phenylene))bis(3-(thiophen-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one) is synthesized and characterized by spectroscopic and single crystal X-ray diffraction techniques from chalcone (E)-1-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-3-(thiophen-2-yl)prop-2-en-1-one) and xylene dibromide. The intermolecular non-covalent interactions such as pi center dot center dot center dot pi, C-H center dot center dot center dot S and C-H center dot center dot center dot pi participate decisive roles in the development of supramolecular structures. An inclusive Hirshfeld surface analysis discloses the presence of intermolecular non-covalent interactions. The 2D fingerprint plots reveal individual atom's percentage contributions in construction of the non-covalent interactions. Hirshfeld energy framework study affirms dominance of the dispersive pi-pi interaction in THXA. Further, energetic estimation for non-covalent interactions of dimeric unit has been calculated through density functional theory (DFT). The molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) surfaces help to describe the charge distribution in THXA. Additionally, the non-covalent interactions in THXA are also examined by computational tools like non-covalent interaction (NCI) plot index and quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM) analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据