4.7 Article

MIL pretreatment on breaking hydrogen bond and swelling of coal: Experiment and simulation

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122805

关键词

LRC; Molecular dynamics; Magnetic ionic liquid; Hydrogen bonds; Swelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The molecular configuration of [C8mim]FeCl4 was synthesized using quantum chemical simulation, and Magnetic ionic liquid (MIL) was used to modify coal for improved swelling efficiency. MIL was found to disrupt weak interactions between coal molecules, leading to changes in pore structure and surface morphology, resulting in improved coal quality.
Since direct combustion of low-rank coal is inefficient, expansion and dissolution are essential for better use of coal as an energy source. In this study, [C8mim]FeCl4 molecular configuration was synthesized by quantum chemical simulation method, and Magnetic ionic liquid (MIL) was used to modify coal to improve its swelling efficiency. The FT-IR and Raman properties of MIL were measured by simulation combined with practical methods. Dmol3 was used to study the hydrogen bond changes of coal molecules induced by MIL. When MIL interacts violently with organic matter in coal, the cross-linking network structure generated by non-covalent bonds is destroyed, resulting in the break of covalent bonds such as hydrogen bonds. Further experimental study shows that the pore structure and surface morphology of modified coal samples will be damaged, indicating that the MIL has the ability to dissolve hydrogen bonds and pretreat low-rank coal. It was found by TGA that MIL treatment can increase the tar yield of coal by up to 4.79% and reduce ash content by 3.51%. Through the integration of molecular modeling and experimental analysis, this study elucidates the fundamental principles underlying MIL pretreatment of coal, thereby providing a viable strategy for efficient quality improvement utilization of low-rank coal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据