4.7 Article

Direct and Absolute Quantification of over 1800 Yeast Proteins via Selected Reaction Monitoring

期刊

MOLECULAR & CELLULAR PROTEOMICS
卷 15, 期 4, 页码 1309-1322

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M115.054288

关键词

-

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Science Research Council [BB/G009058/1, BB/G009112/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/G009058/1, BB/G009112/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/G009112/1, BB/G009058/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Defining intracellular protein concentration is critical in molecular systems biology. Although strategies for determining relative protein changes are available, defining robust absolute values in copies per cell has proven significantly more challenging. Here we present a reference data set quantifying over 1800 Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins by direct means using protein-specific stable-isotope labeled internal standards and selected reaction monitoring (SRM) mass spectrometry, far exceeding any previous study. This was achieved by careful design of over 100 QconCAT recombinant proteins as standards, defining 1167 proteins in terms of copies per cell and upper limits on a further 668, with robust CVs routinely less than 20%. The selected reaction monitoring-derived proteome is compared with existing quantitative data sets, highlighting the disparities between methodologies. Coupled with a quantification of the transcriptome by RNA-seq taken from the same cells, these data support revised estimates of several fundamental molecular parameters: a total protein count of approximate to 100 million molecules-per-cell, a median of approximate to 1000 proteins-per-transcript, and a linear model of protein translation explaining 70% of the variance in translation rate. This work contributes a gold-standard reference yeast proteome (including 532 values based on high quality, dual peptide quantification) that can be widely used in systems models and for other comparative studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据