4.7 Article

Asphaltene structure determination: FTIR, NMR, EA, ICP-OES, MS, XRD and computational chemistry considerations

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR LIQUIDS
卷 385, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.molliq.2023.122279

关键词

Asphaltenes; Structure determination; Spectroscopic techniques; X-ray diffraction; Density functional theory (DFT)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

As complex hydrocarbon molecules, petroleum asphaltenes have posed challenges in crude oil production and have been a focus of research. However, fewer studies have examined the structure of asphaltenes. This study investigates the asphaltene structure of Middle East crude oil using spectroscopic and diffraction techniques, presenting complementary information from various methods. Computational chemistry (DFT) is applied to optimize the structure, showing excellent agreement with experimental data.
As complex hydrocarbon molecules, petroleum asphaltenes pose significant challenges in the crude oil production, making them the focus of many investigations in the literature. Despite this, fewer studies have examined in-depth the structure of asphaltenes. In fact, when trying to understand and predict the macroscopic properties of asphaltene especially its colloidal behaviors, knowledge of its micro and macro structures as well as its chemical composition is of crucial importance. In the present work, the asphaltene separated from one of the Middle East (Iranian) crude oil field is studied by different spectroscopic and diffraction techniques. Indeed, successful determination of asphaltene structure with monomer molecular formula of C90H50O15 and four repeating units via stepwise procedures for handling X-ray diffraction and NMR laboratory data, along with other techniques including FTIR, EA, ICP-OES, and MS, reflecting crucial complementary information, is presented. To optimize the current asphaltene structure, a computational chemistry method (DFT) is applied, and its results show excellent agreement with experimental data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据