Carbon molecular sieve membranes for water separation in CO2 hydrogenation reactions: Effect of the carbonization temperature

Carbon membranes are a potentially attractive candidate for the in-situ removal of water vapor in CO2 hydro-genation reactions. Their hydrophilicity and pore structure can be tuned by properly adjusting the synthesis procedure. Herein, we assess the effect of the carbonization temperature (450-750 degrees C) on the performance of supported CMSM in terms of vapor/gas separation, in correlation with changes in their surface functionality and porous structure. FTIR spectra showed that the nature of the functional groups changes with the evolution of the carbonization step, leading to a gradual loss in hydrophilicity (i.e., OH stretching disappears at Tcarb >= 600 degrees C). The extent of water adsorption displays an optimum at Tcarb of 500 degrees C, with the membrane carbonized at 650 degrees C being the least hydrophilic. We found that the pore size distribution strongly influences the water permeance. At all Tcarb, adsorption-diffusion (AD) is the dominant transport mechanisms. However, as soon as ultra-micropores appear (Tcarb: 600-700 degrees C) molecular sieving (MS) contributes to an increase in the water permeance, despites a loss in hydrophilicity. At Tcarb >= 750 degrees C, MS pores disappear, causing a drop in the water permeance. Finally, the permeance of different gases (N2, H2, CO, CO2) is mostly affected by the pore size distribution, with MS being the dominant mechanism over the AD, except for CO2. However, the extent and mechanism of gas permeation drastically change as a function of the water content in the feed, indicating that gas/vapor molecules need to compete to access the pores of the membranes.

Automated summary

The effect of carbonization temperature on the performance of carbon membranes in vapor/gas separation was assessed. It was found that the nature of functional groups and pore structure changes with carbonization temperature. The presence of ultra-micropores enhances water permeance but reduces hydrophilicity. Gas permeation is mainly influenced by the pore size distribution.