4.7 Article

Discovery of 12 (BMS-986172) as a Highly Potent MGAT2 Inhibitor that Achieved Targeted Efficacious Exposures at a Low Human Dose for the Treatment of Metabolic Disorders

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
卷 66, 期 18, 页码 13135-13147

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.3c01147

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of novel tetrazolone compounds with potent MGAT2 inhibitory activity and favorable in vitro profiles were discovered. These compounds showed significant reduction in food intake and body weight in mouse models. One lead compound (12, BMS-986172) exhibited on-target- and mechanism-based pharmacology in MGAT2 knockout mice, and its favorable pharmacokinetic profile suggested a low dose for achieving targeted efficacious exposures in humans. Phase 1 trial confirmed the achievement of targeted efficacious exposures at a low dose in humans, supporting compound 12 as a potential development candidate for metabolic disorders treatment.
A series of dihydropyridinone (DHP) compounds was prepared and evaluated for MGAT2 activity. The efforts led to the identification of novel tetrazolones with potent MGAT2 inhibitory activity and favorable in vitro profiles. Further tests of select analogues in mouse models revealed significant reduction in food intake and body weight. Subsequent studies in MGAT2 knockout mice with the lead candidate 12 (BMS-986172) showed on-target- and mechanism-based pharmacology. Moreover, its favorable pharmacokinetic (PK) profile and the lack of species variability in the glucuronidation potential resulted in a greater confidence level in the projection of a low dose for achieving targeted efficacious exposures in humans. Consistent with these projections, PK data from a phase 1 trial confirmed that targeted efficacious exposures could be achieved at a low dose in humans, which supported compound 12 as our second and potentially superior development candidate for the treatment of various metabolic disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据