4.7 Article

Efficient reverse genetics approach involving infectious subgenomic amplicon for engineering dengue virus

期刊

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL VIROLOGY
卷 95, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.28978

关键词

dengue virus; Flavivirus; infectious clone; ISA method; reporter gene; reverse genetics

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated the effectiveness of the modified infectious subgenomic amplicon (ISA) method in generating recombinant dengue viruses with robust replication capabilities. The study also successfully inserted a green fluorescence protein gene into the genome of dengue virus serotype 4, highlighting the efficiency of ISA in genetically modifying the virus.
Dengue virus, which belongs to the Flaviviridae family, can induce a range of symptoms from mild to severe, including dengue fever, dengue hemorrhagic fever, and dengue shock syndrome. While infectious cloning technology is a useful tool for understanding viral pathogenesis and symptoms, it exhibits limitations when constructing the entire Flavivirus genome. The instability and toxicity of the genome to bacteria make its full-length construction in bacterial vectors a time-consuming and laborious process. To address these challenges, we employed the modified infectious subgenomic amplicon (ISA) method in this study, which can potentially be a superior tool for reverse genetic studies on the dengue virus. Using ISA, we generated recombinant dengue viruses de novo and validated their robust replication in both human and insect cell lines, which was comparable to that of the original strains. Moreover, the efficiency of ISA in genetically modifying the dengue virus was elucidated by successfully inserting the gene for green fluorescence protein into the genome of dengue virus serotype 4. Overall, this study highlighted the effectiveness of ISA for genetically engineering the dengue virus and provided a technical basis for a convenient reverse genetics system that could expedite investigations into the dengue virus.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据