4.6 Article

Synthesis, spectral confirmation, structural interactions, electronic characteristics, docking, and dynamic stability of twin chiral carboxamide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The structural investigation and characterization of twin chiral carboxamide compounds synthesized by slow-evaporation method were described. The chirality of the compounds was confirmed, and the intermolecular connections were analyzed. The chemical electronic characteristics and binding affinities were characterized using computational methods.
The structural investigation of twin chiral carboxamide compounds synthesized by slow-evaporation style, namely Ch-1 [(S)-N-(1-phenylethyl)thiophene-2-carboxamide (Ch-1S) & (R)-N-(1-phenylethyl)thiophene-2-carboxamide (Ch-1R)] and Ch-2 [(S)-N-(1-phenylethyl)furan-2-carboxamide (Ch-2S) & (R)-N-(1-phenylethyl)furan-2-carboxamide (Ch-2R) were described by X-ray analysis and the chiral compounds crystallized like isomers with little discrepancies in lattice parameters. The synthesized chiral compounds were characterized via FT-IR, UV-visible, NMR, and mass spectroscopic techniques. The chirality of the compound was confirmed by the absolute structure parameter and specific rotation values. The perceptible inter- and intra-molecular connections of twin chiral were analyzed by Hirshfeld surface (HS) analysis with respective 2D Fingerprint (2D-FP) plots which gave the contacts contribution rate. N-H & sdot;& sdot;& sdot;O inter- and intra-molecular contact is chiefly answerable for crystal stuffing in both chiral. By employing the DFT computation, the chemical electronic characteristics such as energies of molecular orbitals (FMO), electrostatic potential (MESP), and Mullican's charge/atom (MAC) were characterized. The binding affinities of the chiral have been hypothesized with target CDC7-kinase inhibitor by performing docking studies (MDOC). The dynamic simulation (MDS) was prescribed to confirm the molecular stability of the chiral with the calculation of binding free energy (BFE).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据