4.3 Article

Comparison of paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin versus paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer

期刊

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/03000605231200267

关键词

Ovarian cancer; chemotherapy; paclitaxel liposome; carboplatin; biochemical marker; adverse event

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the efficacy of paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. The results showed that paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin had a higher overall response rate and could reduce serum marker levels and the occurrence of adverse reactions.
ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel combined with carboplatin in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer and assess their effects on serum human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), CA125, CA199, matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP2), MMP-7, and MMP-9 levels.MethodsIn this observational study, 102 patients with advanced ovarian cancer were assigned to receive paclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin (Group A) or paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (Group B). Clinical efficacy; serum HE4, CA125, CA199, MMP-2, MMP-7, and MMP-9 levels; and the occurrence of adverse reactions were compared between the groups.ResultsThe overall response rate was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B. After chemotherapy, serum HE4, CA125, CA199, MMP-2, MMP-7, and MMP-9 levels were lower in Group A than in Group B. The incidence of myalgia, dyspnea, nausea and vomiting, facial flushing, peripheral neuropathy, and skin rash was lower in Group A than in Group B.ConclusionPaclitaxel liposomes combined with carboplatin displayed better efficacy in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer than paclitaxel combined with carboplatin, which might be attributable to reductions in serum marker levels and the occurrence of adverse events.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据