4.4 Article

Enhanced resistive switching characteries in HfOx memory devices by embedding W nanoparticles

期刊

JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS
卷 45, 期 3, 页码 5159-5167

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JIFS-232028

关键词

Resistive random access memory (RRAM); HfOx; embedding W nanoparticles; uniformity; conduction mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the HfOx-based RRAM with embedded tungsten nanoparticles (W NPs) and compares its performance with the regular RRAM device. The results show that the W NPs device exhibits lower switching voltage, more stable cycling endurance, and higher uniformity, which can be attributed to the control and influence on the conductive filaments (CFs) size and paths.
Resistive random access memory (RRAM) has lots of advantages that make it a promising candidate for ultrahigh-density memory applications and neuromorphic computing. However, challenges such as high forming voltage, low endurance, and poor uniformity have hampered the development and application of RRAM. To improve the uniformity of the resistive memory, this paper systematically investigates the HfOx-based RRAM by embedding nanoparticles. In this paper, the HfOx-Based RRAM with and without tungsten nanoparticles (W NPs) is fabricated by magnetron sputtering, UV lithography, and stripping. Comparing the various resistive switching behaviors of the two devices, it can be observed that the W NPs device exhibits lower switching voltage (including a 69.87% reduction in V-forming and a reduction in V-set/V-reset from 1.4 V/-1.36 to 0.7 V/-1.0 V), more stable cycling endurance (>10(5) cycles), and higher uniformity. A potential switching mechanism is considered based on the XPS analysis and the research on the fitting of HRS and LRS: Embedding WNPs can improve the device performance by inducing and controlling the conductive filaments (CFs) size and paths. This thesis has implications for the performance enhancement and development of resistive memory.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据