4.6 Article

Plasmablastic lymphoma phenotype is determined by genetic alterations in MYC and PRDM1

期刊

MODERN PATHOLOGY
卷 30, 期 1, 页码 85-94

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.162

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo, Spain [PI051623, PI052800, CP06/00002]
  2. Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer (AECC), Spain
  3. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion, Spain [SAF 2008-03871]
  4. Ministerio de Economia y competitividad [MBAE BA15/00053]
  5. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo (RTICC), Spain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plasmablastic lymphoma is an uncommon aggressive non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma type defined as a high-grade large B-cell neoplasm with plasma cell phenotype. Genetic alterations in MYC have been found in a proportion (similar to 60%) of plasmablastic lymphoma cases and lead to MYC-protein overexpression. Here, we performed a genetic and expression profile of 36 plasmablastic lymphoma cases and demonstrate that MYC overexpression is not restricted to MYC-translocated (46%) or MYC-amplified cases (11%). Furthermore, we demonstrate that recurrent somatic mutations in PRDM1 are found in 50% of plasmablastic lymphoma cases (8 of 16 cases evaluated). These mutations target critical functional domains (PR motif, proline rich domain, acidic region, and DNA-binding Zn-finger domain) involved in the regulation of different targets such as MYC. Furthermore, these mutations are found frequently in association with MYC translocations (5 out of 9, 56% of cases with MYC translocations were PROM-mutated), but not restricted to those cases, and lead to expression of an impaired PRDM1/Blimpla protein. Our data suggest that PRDM1 mutations in plasmablastic lymphoma do not impair terminal B-cell differentiation, but contribute to the oncogenicity of MYC, usually disregulated by MYC translocation or MYC amplification. In conclusion, aberrant coexpression of MYC and PRDM1/Blimp1a owing to genetic changes is responsible for the phenotype of plasmablastic lymphoma cases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据