4.4 Review

Genomic newborn screening: Are we entering a new era of screening?

期刊

JOURNAL OF INHERITED METABOLIC DISEASE
卷 46, 期 5, 页码 778-795

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jimd.12650

关键词

actionable conditions; challenges and opportunities of genomic newborn screening; EURORDIS; Genomics England; metabolic diseases; metabolic newborn screening; whole genome sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population newborn screening (NBS) for phenylketonuria started in the US in 1963, and advances in mass spectrometry led to the recognition of multiple disorders with a single test. With the development of genomic testing, the range of conditions recognized after birth has expanded significantly. Different organizations and research projects propose various genomic screening strategies, taking into account factors such as clear benefits and other types of benefits. Ethical considerations should be made regarding asymptomatic, mild, or late-onset presentations where pre-symptomatic treatment may not be necessary.
Population newborn screening (NBS) for phenylketonuria began in the United States in 1963. In the 1990s electrospray ionization mass spectrometry permitted an array of pathognomonic metabolites to be identified simultaneously, enabling up to 60 disorders to be recognized with a single test. In response, differing approaches to the assessment of the harms and benefits of screening have resulted in variable screening panels worldwide. Thirty years on and another screening revolution has emerged with the potential for first line genomic testing extending the range of screening conditions recognized after birth to many hundreds. At the annual SSIEM conference in 2022 in Freiburg, Germany, an interactive plenary discussion on genomic screening strategies and their challenges and opportunities was conducted. The Genomics England Research project proposes the use of Whole Genome Sequencing to offer extended NBS to 100 000 babies for defined conditions with a clear benefit for the child. The European Organization for Rare Diseases seeks to include actionable conditions considering also other types of benefits. Hopkins Van Mil, a private UK research institute, determined the views of citizens and revealed as a precondition that families are provided with adequate information, qualified support, and that autonomy and data are protected. From an ethical standpoint, the benefits ascribed to screening and early treatment need to be considered in relation to asymptomatic, phenotypically mild or late-onset presentations, where presymptomatic treatment may not be required. The different perspectives and arguments demonstrate the unique burden of responsibility on those proposing new and far-reaching developments in NBS programs and the need to carefully consider both harms and benefits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据