4.7 Review

Key challenges, recent advances and future perspectives of rechargeable lithium-sulfur batteries

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiec.2023.04.025

关键词

Lithium-sulfur battery; Shuttle effect; Polysulfides; Reaction mechanism; High specific energy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery, which combines abundant sulfur with lithium metal to release energy, is considered a potential substitute for current lithium-ion batteries. However, the shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides, large volume change, poor conductivity of sulfur and its solid-state products, and self-discharge phenomenon limit its practical application. This review systematically introduces the development of Li-S batteries, summarizes the latest work on anode, cathode, separator and electrolyte, and proposes some promising views on future research directions of this battery system.
Lithium-sulfur (Li-S) battery, which releases energy by coupling high abundant sulfur with lithium metal, is considered as a potential substitute for the current lithium-ion battery. Thanks to the lightweight and multi-electron reaction of sulfur cathode, the Li-S battery can achieve a high theoretical specific capacity of 1675 mAh g-1 and specific energy of 2600 Wh kg-1. However, some key scientific issues limit its prac-tical application, such as the shuttle effect of lithium polysulfides, large volume change, poor conduc-tivity of sulfur and its solid-state products, and self-discharge phenomenon. Of these, the shuttle effect is recognized as the most critical challenge affecting on electrochemical performance. Hence, this review first systematically introduces the development of Li-S batteries and the corresponding shuttle effect. Then, the latest work on anode, cathode, separator and electrolyte are summarized. Finally, some promis-ing views on the future research direction of this battery system are put forward. (c) 2023 The Korean Society of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据