4.7 Article

Associations between exposure to ambient particulate matter and advanced liver fibrosis in Chinese MAFLD patients

期刊

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
卷 460, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132501

关键词

MAFLD; Advanced liver fibrosis; NAFLD fibrosis score; Ambient particulate matter

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found a link between long-term exposure to ambient particulate matter (PM) and advanced liver fibrosis (ALF) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Higher levels of PM1, PM2.5, and PM10 were associated with an increased risk of ALF. PM2.5 had a stronger impact on ALF compared to PM1 and PM10.
Background & Aims: Liver fibrosis is an important feature in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). This study aimed to explore the association between long-term ambient particulate matter (PM) exposure and advanced liver fibrosis (ALF) in MAFLD participants. Methods: A cross-sectional study of 23170 adults recruited from 33 provinces of China from 2010 to 2020. ALF was detected using the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS). The annual average levels of particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters of <= 1 mu m (PM1), <= 2.5 mu m (PM2.5) and <= 10 mu m (PM10) were calculated using validated spatiotemporal models. Generalized additive models were applied to analyze the association between PM and ALF in patients with MAFLD. Results: One-year exposure to higher levels of all PM was found to increase the risk of ALF, with odds ratios (ORs) of 1.10 (95% CI 1.06-1.14), 1.05 (1.03-1.07), and 1.03(1.02-1.04) for each 10 mu g/m(3) increase in PM1, PM2.5 and PM10, respectively. With the dissection of the impact of PM1 in PM2.5, PM2.5 in PM10 and PM1 in PM10, we found that PM2.5 had a stronger impact on ALF (both Pinteraction<0.05) in comparison with PM1 and PM10. Conclusions: Long-term exposure to PM is associated with ALF in patients with MAFLD, with PM2.5 playing a dominant role.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据