4.6 Article

Prescriber Perspectives and Experiences with Deprescribing Versus Continuing Bisphosphonates in Older Nursing Home Residents with Dementia

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08275-4

关键词

osteoporosis; hip fracture; pharmacotherapy; nursing homes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to identify factors that influence prescriber decision-making for deprescribing of bisphosphonates for older nursing home (NH) residents with dementia. The study found that patient-level (intrapersonal) and external (interpersonal, system, community, and policy) influences are key factors in prescriber decision-making. While prescribers generally agreed on the reasons for deprescribing, barriers at the interpersonal and system levels limited implementation. Additionally, the lack of guidelines and criteria for deprescribing, including certainty regarding prior fractures and the absence of bone densitometry in NHs, posed challenges at the policy level.
BackgroundFew guidelines address fracture prevention medication use in nursing home (NH) residents with dementia.ObjectiveWe sought to identify factors that influence prescriber decision-making for deprescribing of bisphosphonates for older NH residents with dementia.MethodsWe conducted 12 semi-structured interviews with prescribers who care for older adults with dementia in NHs.Main MeasuresInterview prompts addressed experiences treating fractures, benefits, and harms of bisphosphonates, and experiences with deprescribing. Coding was guided by the social-ecological framework including patient-level (intrapersonal) and external (interpersonal, system, community, and policy) influences.ResultsMost prescribers were physicians (83%); 75% were female and 75% were White. Most (75%) spent less than half of their clinical effort in NHs and half were in the first decade of practice. Among patient-level influences, prescribers uniformly agreed that a prior bisphosphonate treatment course of several years, emergence of adverse effects, and changing goals of care or limited life expectancy were compelling reasons to deprescribe. External influences were frequently discussed as barriers to deprescribing. At the interpersonal level, prescribers noted that family/informal caregivers are diverse in their involvement in decision-making, and frequently concerned about the adverse effects of bisphosphonates, but perceive deprescribing as withdrawing care. At the health system level, prescribers felt that frequent transitions make it difficult to determine duration of prior treatment and to implement deprescribing. At the policy level, prescribers highlighted the lack of guidelines addressing residents with limited mobility and dementia or criteria for deprescribing, including uncertainty in the setting of prior fractures and lack of bone densitometry in NHs.ConclusionSystems-level barriers to evaluating bone densitometry and treatment history in NHs may impede person-centered decision-making for fracture prevention. Further research is needed to evaluate the residual benefits of bisphosphonates in medically complex residents with limited mobility and dementia to inform recommendations for deprescribing versus continued use.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据