4.7 Article

Study on the interaction mechanism, physicochemical properties and application in oil-in-water emulsion of soy protein isolate and tannic acid

期刊

JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING
卷 357, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2023.111626

关键词

SPI-TA; Combination; Emulsion; Oxidation; Digestion

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The combination of plant protein and polyphenol compounds is an effective strategy to improve the stability of protein emulsions. This study focused on the interaction between soy protein isolate (SPI) and tannic acid (TA) and studied their physicochemical properties and application in O/W emulsions. The results showed that the main non-covalent interaction between SPI and TA was hydrogen bond and van der Waals force. TA improved the emulsifying ability and reduced the interfacial tension of SPI, resulting in a stable emulsion with inhibited lipid digestion and oxidation.
The combination of plant protein and polyphenol compounds is an effective strategy to improve the ability of this protein stabilized emulsion. However, the influence of interaction between protein and polyphenol complex on the emulsion was unclear. Therefore, this study took soy protein isolate (SPI) and tannic acid (TA) as the research object, systematically studied the interaction mechanism, physicochemical properties and application in O/W emulsion. The results showed that the main non-covalent interaction was hydrogen bond and van der Waals force of SPI-TA. The addition of TA changed the secondary structure and reduced the surface hydrophobicity of SPI. In terms of functional properties, TA improved the emulsifying ability and reduced the interfacial tension of SPI. In addition, SPI-TA complex, as a complex emulsifier, could form a stable emulsion, which inhibited the speed and extent of oil oxidation and lipid digestion. Our research results could provide some help for the elaboration of the interaction mechanism of SPI-TA and the preparation of antioxidant emulsions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据