4.7 Review

Towards autonomous selective harvesting: A review of robot perception, robot design, motion planning and control

期刊

JOURNAL OF FIELD ROBOTICS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rob.22230

关键词

agriculture; computer vision; motion control; motion planning; precision farming; robotics; selective harvesting

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an overview of the current state-of-the-art in selective harvesting robots (SHRs) and their potential for addressing the challenges of global food production. It discusses the main components of SHRs, the challenges in developing SHR technologies, and the potential benefits of integrating artificial intelligence and soft robots. The paper also identifies open research questions in the field and highlights the need for further research and development efforts to advance SHR technologies.
This paper provides an overview of the current state-of-the-art in selective harvesting robots (SHRs) and their potential for addressing the challenges of global food production. SHRs have the potential to increase productivity, reduce labor costs, and minimize wastage by selectively harvesting only ripe fruits and vegetables. The paper discusses the main components of SHRs, including perception, grasping, cutting, motion planning, and control. It also highlights the challenges in developing SHR technologies, particularly in the areas of robot design, motion planning, and control. The paper also discusses the potential benefits of integrating artificial intelligence and soft robots and data-driven methods to enhance the performance and robustness of SHR systems. Finally, the paper identifies several open research questions in the field and highlights the need for further research and development efforts to advance SHR technologies to meet the challenges of global food production. Overall, this paper provides a starting point for researchers and practitioners interested in developing SHRs and highlights the need for more research in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据