4.7 Article

Siting MPAs for multiple protecting purposes by co-consideration of ecological importance and anthropogenic impacts

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 337, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117718

关键词

Marine protected areas; Site selection; Spatial multi-criteria decision analysis; Ordered weighted averaging

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used the GIS-based AHP-OWA method to determine different levels of priority protection for marine protected areas (MPAs) in Zhejiang, China by considering three major anthropogenic impact factors and two main ecological importance factors. The results identified the best locations for MPAs in the northeast, central, and southern marine areas of Zhejiang. The proposed MPA siting method and case study may serve as a technical reference for regional marine spatial planning (MSP) issues in the future.
The global marine ecosystem has been significantly altered by the combined effects of multiple anthropogenic impacts. Systematic planning of marine protected areas (MPAs) is of paramount importance in alleviating conflicts between humans and the sea. Existing approaches, however, merely integrate both ecological and anthropogenic factors for multiple conservation purposes. By combining the three main anthropogenic impact factors with two main ecological importance factors, this study used a GIS-based AHP-OWA method to identify different levels of priority protection for MPAs in Zhejiang, China. Our results proved that: 1) the multi-objective MPA siting issues can be addressed by the GIS-based AHP-OWA method through scenario simulation; 2) the best locations for MPAs are in the northeast, central, and southern marine areas of Zhejiang; 3) considering the trade-off degree, spatial conservation efficiency, and spatial heterogeneity, an optimized MPA siting scheme can be developed for decision-makers. The proposed MPA siting method and case study may provide an effective technical reference for solving regional marine spatial planning (MSP) issues in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据