4.3 Article

Design of advanced and highly effective partially bio-energetic polybenzoxazines as the next generation of reactive structure materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGETIC MATERIALS
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/07370652.2023.2236608

关键词

Benzoxazine; energetic polymers; explosophore groups; Mannich reaction; vanillin; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new class of energetic green benzoxazine polymers was developed using vanillin as a renewable reactant. The monomers were synthesized through the reaction of vanillin with compounds containing exploshores groups, specifically 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine and para-nitroaniline. The resulting polymers showed promising energetic performances and high thermal stability, making them suitable as reactive structure materials.
In this study, a new class of energetic green benzoxazine polymers is introduced based on vanillin, as a renewable reactant. The newly developed monomers were afforded by the reaction of vanillin with exploshores groups bearing compounds, namely the 2,4 dinitrophenylhydrazine and the para-nitroaniline, respectively, following the typical Mannich reaction. The chemical structure and the formation of the oxazine ring of both monomers were confirmed by H-1 and C-13 NMR, FTIR, and elemental analysis. The ring opening polymerization mechanism was investigated by FTIR and DSC-TGA analyses. The energetic performances, as well as the physicochemical properties, were studied by a bomb calorimeter, deflagration tester, and electronic densimeter. Overall, both polymers showed promising energetic performances with deflagration temperatures of about 275 and 261 & DEG;C for the 2,4 dinitrophenylhydrazine and para-nitroaniline-based polybenzoxazines, respectively. The thermal analysis results highlighted that these polymers can be effectively used as reactive structure materials (RSMs) owing to their combination of high thermal stability above operational temperatures and remarkable energetic performances.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据