4.7 Article

Biomass activated carbon supported Keggin-type polyoxometalate as an electrode material for high-performance acidic aqueous supercapacitors

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2023.117779

关键词

Activated carbon; Keggin-type polyoxometalate; Supercapacitors; Biomass

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activated carbon with micropore and mesopore structure was prepared using soybean straw as a carbon source. A composite material PMo12/SSAC-OP was obtained by introducing redox-active H3PMo12O40 into SSAC-OP. The composite material exhibited both electric double layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance characteristics, with high specific capacitance and good cycling stability.
Activated carbon (SSAC-OP) with micropore and mesopore was prepared by using soybean straw as a carbon source. Redox-active H3PMo12O40 (PMo12) was introduced into SSAC-OP by solution impregnation to obtain composite PMo12/SSAC-OP. The effect of loading amount of PMo12 on the supercapacitive performance of the composite was investigated. BET and EDS results confirmed that PMo12 is adsorbed in the micropores of 1-2 nm and mesopores of SSAC-OP, as well as on the carbon wall of SSAC-OP. Meanwhile, SSAC-OP with positive charge is more firmly connected with PMo12 anions via the effect of electrostatic attraction. CV and GCD test results proved that the composite materials have both electric double layer capacitance and pseudocapacitance characteristics. The CV curve of 10-PMo12/SSAC-OP obtained from SSAC-OP impregnating the initial concentration of PMo12 solution of 10 mM shows four pairs of obvious reversible redox peaks, which indicates that the protonation of PMo12 anion in the reduction process is sufficient. The composite 10-PMo12/SSAC-OP has a specific capacitance as high as 397.02F g-1 at scan rate of 5 mV s-1. The assembled symmetric supercapacitor delivers an energy density of 23.90 Wh kg-1 under the power density of 1016.05 W kg-1, with 97.96 % capacitance retention after 10,000 cycles at 3 A g-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据