4.5 Review

Targeted therapies against breast cancer: Clinical perspectives, obstacles and new opportunities

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jddst.2023.105049

关键词

Breast cancer; Nanomedicine; Immunotherapy; Cancer vaccines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Breast cancer is a common disease with various treatment options, including chemotherapy, surgery, and radiotherapy. However, chemotherapy drugs have limitations. Nanomedicine drugs have emerged as a promising alternative for breast cancer treatment, along with the development of immunotherapies and cancer vaccines.
Breast cancer is a multifaceted, heterogeneous disease that manifests in the mammary gland. According to the WHO, more than 2.3 million cases are diagnosed each year, making it the most common malignancy among adults. The primary treatment of tumors includes chemotherapy, surgical resection, and radiotherapy. Although chemotherapy plays an irreplaceable role in tumor treatment, the drugs used generally show poor bioavailability, instability, lack of targeting, and toxicity. The major challenge facing chemotherapy regimens against cancers includes dose-limiting side effects on healthy tissues. A published meta-analysis indicated that only 0.7 % of the drug reaches the target. Thus, developing new therapies for the treatment of cancer is the need of the hour. The advent of drug resistance has been one of the major challenges facing researchers. Over the years, extensive investigations in the fields of cancer biomedical research and nanotechnology have evolved. Nanomedicine drugs have become an excellent alternative for the treatment of breast cancer, including Doxil (R), Abraxane (R), and other products widely used clinically. This review highlights potential strategies for the treatment of breast cancer and includes clinical trials data on available therapies. The role of immunotherapies including monoclonal anti-bodies, and the status of cancer vaccines have also been addressed in this work.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据