4.3 Review

Systematic review of mesotherapy: a novel avenue for the treatment of hair loss

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2245084

关键词

Mesotherapy; local intradermal therapy; pattern hair loss; alopecia; physical therapy; >

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This systematic review summarizes 27 articles out of 416 records on the efficacy of mesotherapy for the treatment of hair loss, providing an overview of the observed results. Although several studies report significant improvements in hair growth after treatment, there is a lack of standardized regimens. Further large-scale and controlled clinical trials are needed to evaluate the utility of mesotherapy for hair loss disorders.
Mesotherapy is a technique by which lower doses of therapeutic agents and bioactive substances are administered by intradermal injections to the skin. Through intradermal injections, mesotherapy can increase the residence time of therapeutic agents in the affected area, thus allowing for the use of lower doses and longer intervals between sessions which may in turn improve the treatment outcome and patient compliance. This systematic review aims to summarize the current literature that evaluates the efficacy of this technique for the treatment of hair loss and provides an overview of the results observed. Of the 416 records identified, 27 articles met the inclusion criteria. To date, mesotherapy using 6 classes of agents and their combinations have been studied; this includes dutasteride, minoxidil, growth factors or autologous suspension, botulinum toxin A, stem cells, and mesh solutions/multivitamins. While several studies report statistically significant improvements in hair growth after treatment, there is currently a lack of standardized regimens. The emergence of adverse effects after mesotherapy has been reported. Further large-scale and controlled clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the utility of mesotherapy for hair loss disorders.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据