4.7 Article

Direct sandwich ELISA to detect the adulteration of human breast milk by cow milk

期刊

JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE
卷 106, 期 9, 页码 5908-5915

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2022-22589

关键词

human breast milk adulteration; sandwich ELISA; IgG; food adulteration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The demand for commercially available human breast milk has been increasing lately, and there is a concern that it is being adulterated with other types of milk. This fraudulent practice can put infants at risk due to potential intolerance or allergy to cow milk. To address this issue, a specific and sensitive assay called the direct sandwich anti-bovine IgG ELISA has been developed, which is able to detect even a small amount of cow milk in adulterated human breast milk.
The demand for commercially available human breast milk has significantly increased in recent years. For various reasons, a significant amount of commercially available human breast milk is being adulterated with other types of milk. This fraudulent practice poses a threat to consumers' health due to potential adulter-ants such as cow milk, which may put the infant at risk due to intolerance or allergy. A direct sandwich anti-bovine IgG ELISA has been developed for the sen-sitive and specific detection of cow milk in adulterated human breast milk. This assay uses polyclonal anti-bovine IgG antibody as a capture antibody and mono-clonal anti-bovine IgG-alkaline phosphatase antibody as a detection antibody. Once optimized, the assay was found to be highly sensitive, and specific to bovine IgG. The assay had no significant cross-reaction with human breast milk, indicating that it was highly specific. The anti-bovine IgG ELISA was able to detect the presence of cow milk in adulterated human breast milk with a detection limit of 0.001% cow milk. The developed assay was highly reproducible (coefficient of variation <10%). The developed direct sandwich anti-bovine IgG ELISA is simple, reliable, and reproducible, making it an ideal test for this purpose.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据