4.8 Article

Small volume blood-brain barrier opening in macaques with a 1 MHz ultrasound phased array

期刊

JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE
卷 363, 期 -, 页码 707-720

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2023.10.015

关键词

Focused ultrasound; Blood-brain barrier; Interventional neuroradiology; MRI; Ultrasound

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates the performance of a system using focused ultrasound to open the blood-brain barrier. The results show that incorporating grey matter segmentation improves spatial precision and the system can be used to deliver drugs and gene therapy to small brain regions.
The use of focused ultrasound to open the blood-brain barrier (BBB) has the potential to deliver drugs to specific regions of the brain. The size of the BBB opening and ability to localize the opening determines the spatial extent and is a limiting factor in many applications of BBB opening where targeting a small brain region is desired. Here we evaluate the performance of a system designed for small opening volumes and highlight the unique challenges associated with pushing the spatial precision of this technique. To achieve small volume openings in cortical regions of the macaque brain, we tested a custom 1 MHz array transducer integrated into a magnetic resonance image-guided focused ultrasound system. Using real-time cavitation monitoring, we demonstrated twelve in-stances of single sonication, small volume BBB opening with average volumes of 59 +/- 37 mm3 and 184 +/- 2 mm3 in cortical and subcortical targets, respectively. We found high correlation between subject-specific acoustic simulations and observed openings when incorporating grey matter segmentation (R2 = 0.8577), and the threshold for BBB opening based on simulations was 0.53 MPa. Analysis of MRI-based safety assessment and cavitation signals indicate a safe pressure range for 1 MHz BBB opening and suggest that our system can be used to deliver drugs and gene therapy to small brain regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据