4.7 Article

Ternary dual S-scheme In2O3/SnIn4S8/CdS heterojunctions for boosted light-to-hydrogen conversion

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 650, 期 -, 页码 416-425

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.211

关键词

In2O3/SnIn4S8/CdS; dual S-scheme; Electronic interaction; Water splitting; Hydrogen evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CdS nanodots-modified In2O3/SnIn4S8 hollow nanotubes were synthesized, which showed impressive photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rate and apparent quantum yield. The migration of photoinduced electrons from both CdS and In2O3 to SnIn4S8 contributed to the ternary dual S-scheme modes, promoting faster charge separation and better visible light absorption. This work reveals a method for sustainably converting solar energy into hydrogen without precious metals through rational design of S-scheme heterojunctions.
Developing artificial S-scheme systems with highly active catalysts is significant to long-term solar-to-hydrogen conversion. Herein, CdS nanodots-modified hierarchical In2O3/SnIn4S8 hollow nanotubes were synthesized by an oil bath method for water splitting. Benefiting from the synergy among the hollow structure, tiny size effect, matched energy level positions, and abundant coupling heterointerfaces, the optimized nanohybrid attains an impressive photocatalytic hydrogen evolution rate of 110.4 mu mol/h, and the corresponding apparent quantum yield reaches 9.7% at 420 nm. On In2O3/SnIn4S8/CdS interfaces, the migration of photoinduced electrons from both CdS and In2O3 to SnIn4S8 via intense electronic interactions contributes to the ternary dual S-scheme modes, which are beneficial to promote faster spatial charge separation, deliver better visible light-harvesting ability, and provide more reaction active sites with high potentials. This work reveals protocols for rational design of on-demand S-scheme heterojunctions for sustainably converting solar energy into hydrogen in the absence of precious metals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据