4.7 Article

Diffusiophoresis of latex driven by anionic nanoparticles and their counterions

期刊

JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE
卷 649, 期 -, 页码 364-371

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2023.06.115

关键词

Colloidal hydrodynamics; Diffusiophoresis; Multivalent electrolytes; Silica nanoparticles; Diblock copolymer nanoparticles; Hele-Shaw cell

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study observes the diffusion behavior of two types of charged colloidal particles (silica particles and diblock copolymer particles) under concentration gradient conditions, and finds that the concentration of the particles scales approximately with the square root of time. These observations are consistent with a recently developed theory that explains diffusiophoretic motion driven by multivalent ions.
Hypothesis: Diffusiophoresis of colloidal latex particles has been reported for molecular anions and cations of comparable size. In the present study, this phenomenon is observed for two types of charged colloids acting as multivalent electrolyte: (i) anionic charge-stabilised silica nanoparticles or (ii) minimally-charged sterically-stabilised diblock copolymer nanoparticles. Experiments: Using a Hele-Shaw cell, a thin layer of relatively large latex particles is established within a sharp concentration gradient of nanoparticles by sequential filling with water, latex particles and nanoparticles. Asymmetric diffusion is observed, which provides strong evidence for diffusiophoresis. Quantification involves turbidity measurements from backlit images. Findings: The latex particles diffuse across a concentration gradient of charged nanoparticles and the latex concentration front scales approximately with time1/2. Moreover, the latex particle flux is inversely proportional to the concentration of background salt, confirming electrostatically-driven motion. These observations are consistent with theory recently developed to account for diffusiophoretic motion driven by multivalent ions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据